| Apo-m-Calpain (1kfu) | Zoom in on Catalytic Center |
|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
| Apo-m-Calpain | Zoom in on Catalytic Center |
![]() |
![]() |
Upon binding of Ca++, the small subunit dissociates. A couple of recent crystal structures of domains I and II (the upper part in the figure above) also help to explain the initiation of activity.
| Apo-m-Calpain, Domains I and II |
|---|
![]() |
The autolytically cleaved sequence is colored in red.
The binding of two Ca++ in domains I and II activates m-calpain, whereas binding Ca++ similarly in m-calpain produces only slight activity.
| Domains I and II of m-Calpain | Closeup of Catalytic Center |
|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
| Domains I and II of m-Calpain | Closeup of Catalytic Center |
![]() |
![]() |
| Human Calmodulin (1cll) |
|---|
![]() |
Recall that this helix-loop-helix motif, with the helices roughly perpendicular is called an EF-Hand.
Here is an example of the calcium binding sites of calpain
| EF-Hand in Calpain (residues 572-600) |
|---|
![]() |
| Sequence Alignment, Calpain and Calmodulin EF Hands |
![]() |
Exactly how additional Ca++ activates the m-calpain is not yet known, but it probably is related to interactions between the other Ca-binding domains and the catalytic domains.
Elce and co-workers [Biochem. J., 2000, 367, 263] found that mutations of EF-Hand residues had limited effect on the binding of calcium by the two proteins. They concluded:
Unfortunately, they were not very specific about which difference, or how cooperativity was altered.